ECON 201 Principles of Macroeconomics
An introduction to understanding the economy (or economies) as a whole. One of two intro courses in economics. Serves as a general education course in the social sciences. Required for a number of majors beyond Economics: Business Administration, International Affairs, and Environmental Science. Required for certification to teach secondary school, and satisfies the requirement to take one economics course to teach elementary education.
Learning Objectives
- Learn what an educated person should know about economics and the US economy, and
- Learn how to analyze issues & problems the way an economist would.
Online Learning Environment Description
This course explores the same content as my traditional face-to-face course, but it does so differently to respect and exploit the differences between face-to-face and online teaching and learning. (Indeed, I will be teaching a face-to-face version of the course at the same time as my online version. Students will be using the same texts, completing most of the same assignments, and taking the same exams.) I hope to design an online course that provides a learning experience that is at least as true to the values of liberal education as my face-to-face course. How will I do that?
The course will have three web spaces: The main administrative (think Course Syllabus) website at http://econ201online.umwblogs.org, the class discussion space at http://edisc.economooc.com/, and the MacroMOOC at http://economooc.com , discussed below. The administrative space will be the “course” website built in umwblogs. The main website will provide the normal sorts of content on a course site as well as links to the Discussion and MacroMOOC sites. The contents of these sites will be explained in more detail below.
The Discussion space will take the place of the class sessions in my traditional course. In my traditional course, I would lead the class through interactive lectures in which I pose questions to help students work through the material. In this online course, I want to do something similar using a schema I developed some years ago which is explained here. The Discussion space looks like a sophisticated discussion board, something like “Reddit” but build on a WordPress platform. Students will be able to post questions, responses (as described below) and comments (i.e. responses to others’ responses). The principal use of the discussion space will be for the class to identify and explain the major concepts, theories and institutional facts/findings for each course topic as described in the schema. To do this well requires critical thinking and discrimination: what are the major items and why are they “major”? Students will initially do this task individually (and I’ll ask them to email me their responses). Next, I’ll ask each student to post one piece of their analysis in the Discussion space, one concept, theory or institutional fact/finding along with their reasoning for choosing it. There are fewer major concepts, theories, and fact/findings than students in the class, so the late students will have to comment on others’ responses, either adding reasoning for why the item is “major” or presenting a reason against including that item. The software allows participants to “vote” up or down responses and comments posted by others. I will guide the discussion to insure that each item is adequately explored. I’ve published three papers on how to facilitate electronic discussions so I have ideas for how this can be done effectively.
The final step will be for small groups to take one of the major items and rewrite the posting to clean up the language and make it understandable to someone who is not taking this course. (I’m considering other possible group scenarios as well, but I haven’t found an approach I like better.) The resulting document, consisting of revised descriptions of the major items, will be posted on the course website as “Class Notes for Topic #.”
I’ve created a MOOC-like website as a forum for exploring, discussing and developing tentative answers to interesting current questions in macroeconomics. (The MacroMOOC will use the same software as our class discussion space, but will be on a different website.) I think this could be a useful experience by bringing more voices into the course than just mine. I have invited colleagues from Canada and the UK as well as different regions of the US to participate in this experiment. Since many of the issues I can imagine discussing have subjective /political components, I think it would be a plus to have our students experience diverse views, both among experts and students.
The basic model will be “modules,” each organized around a single main question. The model might be described as:
- Pose a question/problem,
- Solicit initial responses,
- Identify and explore the facts,
- Submit evidence,
- Develop conclusions incorporating both objective and subjective aspects.
One question that I would like to organize a module around is “Which US Presidential candidate’s economic platform makes the most sense?” I can imagine different responses from people from the US Northeast or say Ohio, people from the US south, Canadians, British, or participants from other parts of the world. I would want to solicit participation from folks of all political and economic persuasions so students get the full breadth of views. While I try to be balanced in my presentation of perspectives different from my own, it’s not the same as hearing it from a proponent. This isn’t primarily intended to be place for people to just emote. Rather, I want the site to generate an analysis of the underlying economic theories, as well as allowing for subjective conclusions. It would be interested to unpack the assumptions behind people’s views. I know my first year students often have strong opinions but aren’t clear on why they hold them. I think this resource could help. I plan to assign my students an initial essay, early in the semester before the students have been exposed to the relevant economic theories, to identify the platforms and explain which they favor. The last essay in the semester will be to rewrite the initial one using what they’ve learned from the class and the MacroMOOC.
Syllabus
Value One: Community
Ideas for Building Community
I am making three short videos, the first introducing myself, the second explaining how the course will be carried out and the third introducing the course content. I will ask students to respond to the first video with a short video introducing themselves to the class. These videos will be posted on the blog page of the course website.
Twitter will be our main communication tool in this course. I plan to use Twitter to create social presence. I will be tweeting daily using the hashtag “#econ201online” and I will ask students to tweet regularly as part of their “class participation.” I will provide daily prompts which students can respond to if they have no other ideas. I will encourage students to tweet any questions they have about the course, and I will encourage students to answer any questions they can, before I step in.
The course (administrative) website will be configured as a group blog to which each participate can post content. I will begin with several introductory videos to the course, first by introducing myself. I will ask students to respond with their own introductory video, telling something about themselves. The course is writing-intensive, and when a student writes a particularly good essay, I will ask them to share it on the group blog.
Additionally, we will use the collaborative space (described above) to work together to construct the class’ understanding of the text materials.
Finally, I will use the “experimental” nature of this course to build community among the participants. We will all try to figure out how online teaching and learning works, and I will emphasize that I will not apply any sorts of grade quotas.
The MacroMOOC (described above) may also help build community.
Community and the Course Learning Objectives
The course is designed to help students help each other learn the course content, both the concepts, institutional facts and findings about macroeconomics that an educated person should know and also how to use economic models to analyze issues and problems. Through teaching others in the class, students will learn more deeply themselves. Past experience has shown me that the result will not be “bright” students teaching “dim” ones, but rather all students teaching each other. That is, the teaching goes both ways. This won’t be effective without a sense of community.
Value Two: Interactivity
Ideas for Building Interactivity
Many of the things mentioned in the previous section on Community will also foster interactivity.
Additionally,
- I will reply to student emails within 24 hours.
- I will return student essays with comments within one week.
- I will encourage students to participate via twitter on a (near) daily basis. I will provide daily prompts, which they can respond to if they don’t have something else to tweet. When students tweet questions, I will encourage other students to answer them, but if no one does, I’ll respond within 24 hours. I will ask students to respond via twitter to the student videos and identify something from a video which resonated with them.
- I will offer both online (via skype) and face-to-face office hours.
- I will schedule a skype meeting with each student in the class by two weeks into the term. The purpose of the meeting will be to see how they seem to be managing in the course (and also to make sure their skype connection works).
The activities in the Discussion space will involve interactivity. After the initial posts and responses, I plan to create small groups with a leader to be responsible for making sure the “final” entry for each “major” element gets revised and published on the course blog. The leadership will vary from one topic to the next.
There will also be a great deal of interactivity in the MacroMOOC.
I considered trying to use each student’s preferred social media for communication, but I think it would prove too hard to link all the students across a variety of media. For this reason I choose twitter.
Interactivity and the Course Learning Objectives
This is related to my response to Value 1, above. Learning works best in a social context which requires interactivity by the participants. My course is based on a communal constructivist approach in which students build their understanding of the course material, but also because the material is complex, I intend for them to work together to build their understanding. The most direct example of this is the “class notes” that they will create in the Discussion space, but Another aspect of this will be the MacroMOOC where the questions to be explored have value-based components. I hope that students will learn from interacting with people of very different opinions than their own. I also expect interaction to play out on twitter, as well as any other group activities which the students develop, such as studying f
Value Three: Active Learning
Ideas for Building Active Learning
Research is active learning. The Presidential Platforms assignment on the OCCR asks students to research and critically evaluate the economic platforms of the US presidential candidates. The assignment will provide the opportunity for students to interact with people from across the U.S. as well as Canada and the UK and determine what they think.
The Discussion space will be used to identify and justify the major concepts, theories and institutional facts/findings in the course content. It’s not sufficient to simply cut and paste, but rather students will need to discriminate among the breadth of content to determine which content is the most important. The group activity to clean up each entry will also require active learning.
Interactive Learning and the Course Learning Objectives
Active learning has been shown to be more effective than passive learning. Students will achieve the learning objectives more readily using the active learning activities of this course than if they simply worked on their own using the texts to learn. Passive learning is adequate for learning facts, but this course teaches application of concepts and analysis of macroeconomic issues which is better accomplished with the active learning pedagogies described above.
Value Four: Reflection
Ideas for Building Reflection
I have always emphasized “What does it mean?” in this course. Economics has both a positive (scientific) and a normative (value-based) dimension. It is easy to forget the latter, but I’m making a special effort in this course to give it appropriate emphasis. I am using the U.S. presidential election as a frame for motivating the entire course. (I did this four years ago with some success. I think it will work better with this online format, especially by bringing outside voices into the course via the MacroMOOC.) Early in the term, I will assign students an essay to identify and evaluate the presidential candidates’ economics platforms. This will be before we study the relevant economic models and before the OOCR starts. I will ask students to write a revised, longer version of the paper at the end of the course, in which students will have to identify something about the other candidates’ platforms that they most agree with, hypothesize what it is about the other candidates’ platforms that other people agree with, and discuss how their views have changed since the initial paper.
[ I considered having students individual blogs but I decided that that would be too much for the first offering of this course. ]
Reflection and the Course Learning Objectives
Good citizenship requires a basic understanding of economics, not just the concepts but how they affect one’s city, state and nation. Understanding what things mean and why are critical to good citizenship. An additional aspect of reflection will be considering where the economic models we study fall short, which some have argued led to the Great Recession.
Value Five: Self-Directed Learning
Ideas for Self-Directed Learning
Online learning by definition requires a certain amount of self-direction. I speak to this early in on at least two of the three introductory videos for the course: “Welcome to ECON 201,” and “How to Take this Course Online.”
A variety of resources are suggested for each topic in the course, along with a set of learning objectives for each. Students can choose their own path to learning the objectives combining different resources plus different types of online discussion (see above).
I also plan to meet at least once a semester and more for those who need it (online) with students to scaffold their learning.
Self-Directed Learning and the Course Learning Objectives
Each student will need to construct their own understanding of the course content using a variety of resources and others’ views, but ultimately they need to learn for themselves.
I’m an objectives dork, but it was drilled into me in my teaching certification program years ago. It’s always good to have active, measurable objectives that include higher order learning. You have both here. #1 is a good knowledge level objective. #2 is a good analysis level objective. I’m not really clear on what an educated person should know and why, but here’s a shot at it.
Articulate basic economic theory and its application within the US economy… (you may add) in order to have an informed perspective on current issues
Analyze issues and problems the way an economist would.
Looks great.
Welcome intro great – personal hobbies nice way to make a connection. It’s also helpful when you share that the course is an experiment. I think students really appreciate being part of something new and different.
Love “what you won’t get in this course”.
Video 3 – Would it be helpful to add instructions for students to open the charts for the video? Another idea is to create a brainshark video with graphics and your charts. Voice over is really easy with this tool and the students already have a face with the voice from your earlier videos. http://www.brainshark.com
After reading the intro, I immediately went to Topic One. Not sure if students will see this navigation or if they will see one topic at a time as you post in Twitter. If they see all topics to the side, you may want to add a word about navigation.
Topics – I really like the questions for thought. (Good motivation.) Do these double as discussion questions? I understand your discussion plan from the description, but don’t see the integration in the topics. You might consider linking to the discussion forum within the topics so students have access from one place.
Each topic has thorough learning objectives and readings. Based on the MacroMOOC page, I assume you plan to link to discussions and other activities from the topic pages. Forgive me if I missed something there during my click through.
I would take out “should be able to” on the objectives and start with the verb… example:
Explain macroeconomics ..
Differentiate between …
Again – just a personal peeve
You’ve put a lot of thought into this course. I believe it is well designed and generally easy to navigate. I suggest using the topics as a central repository for everything. One of the challenges we had was effectively integrating numerous sites. Having everything accessible from one site in addition to being able to navigate to the discussions separately, may be more clear for students.
I hope this helps. I’m really excited for you and your students. Please let me know if you have questions. I did this pretty quickly at the end of the day.
Teaching f2f as well as online… will you get a class release or be able to bank the extra class time?
Threaded discussion or non-?
Voting: will you publish or co-create community norms for online behavior?
Reminds me of your fine spring 2009 finance class.
The double-use Discussion is a good move.
Ditto for international participation.
Will you require a baseline of quantitative work for each module?
Will you use Jim’s shop’s resources?
Daily prompts is a lot of work. Will you accumulate a bank of these before class starts, to save time and draw on your rich teaching experience?
Good.
How will you monitor/assess their Twitter work?
Will you set up a class Twitter list?
You might come up with a Facebook policy, given its predominance. i.e., state if you’re going to check FB, if you want to be part of FB groups for the class, etc.
Will you identify useful and relevant social media sites? I’m thinking of various econbloggers, the EconTalk podcast, etc.
I’m not clear on the relationship between f2f and online classes. Overlap or cleanly separated?
I’m having some trouble envisioning how each of these emailed analyses/postings would work in practice.
This is picky but if I am a student, this description does not tell me anything about the course. Why not list the typical questions that are covered such as “understand national accounts, inflation, unemployment, the business cycle and long-run economic growth…” something like that would help students know a little more about the course.
I don’t know if it’s as important in this section to detail that this course is a requirement for different majors. Instead, I like Steve’s suggestion about using this to further describe what students can expect from the course.
I agree with Wendy on this. These are both way too vague. If our audience is the student, then again, this does not communicate the goals to them well. They don’t know what “analyze” means in the context of economics. I imagine your objectives are far more specific on this point. You want them to be able to understand readings about current events, for example. That means being able to (1) decompose the argument into its assumptions and predictions and (2) be able to reconstruct the argument using the basic tools of, say AD-AS, to (3) evaluate whether the argument makes economic sense. So I think you really are saying you want them to analyze current events (understand arguments), construct their own argument using the theoretical tools taught in the course, and evaluate economic arguments.
for #1, I think this appears to be a “content goal” but I am not sure. I think that is fine, but you could say that more directly. Do you mean learn “economic definitions” or “basic economic theories”?? probably both, but I guess more emphasis is on the latter.
I am confused about what this means:
“Students will initially do this task individually (and I’ll ask them to email me their responses). Next, I’ll ask each student to post one piece of their analysis in the Discussion space, one concept, theory or institutional fact/finding along with their reasoning for choosing it.”
I looked at the link in the paragraph and went to topic 2, supply and demand. So I am trying to think about what these initial “analyses” from the students would look like? Is this them talking about what they think is the most important concept from this chapter readings? Or are you prompting them to read an article where they have to apply supply and demand?
This just is not clear.
ok, so this sounds like this is the more “traditional” greenlaw-deloach kind of ediscussion regarding some controversial topic. no?
If I read this right, then this aspect definitely gets to the objectives of analyzing, constructing and evaluating arguments about current events. This technique is good, well-supported in the literature by research
and provides deep learning to the students.
Why does this take me to a word file that has nothing but a link to a blog page? very awkward.
Having said that, the syllabus looks great! And by the way, your learning objectives for each chapter/module are far-better written than your overall course ones. They are specific and tied to the text. And the list of current events/readings looks awesome. I am going to steal some of these for my macro course this fall.
Are these the readings that students post about in the first discussion space (the Reddit one) that confused me above?
I think with all these discussions, there is no question that community building will happen. You have that, along with most of the other values well-covered with all of this interactivity,
As I said above, you have this nailed!
Again, just being redundant, but this course is highly active and demands individual responsibility. Well done.
Yeah I think you are right there. So to me, the question is can you get them to do that metacognitive step at some point. I tend to think this happens pretty naturally in the course of all these analytical discussions. But maybe not?
So I think your proposed pre-post essay idea is as good as any. Another interesting thing you might try — I am thinking for potential paper/assessment — would be to ask a series of agree/disagree statements at the beginning of the course. Think likert scale stuff. Then at the end, ask the same ones. This would allow you to quantify the extent to which their views have changed. Theoretically, the strength to which they agree or disagree with simple dualistic statements should decrease after the course. e.g., “tax cuts are beneficial to economic growth.” If you get a lot of 4s and 5s on that early, you hopefully would get a lot of 3s and 4s afterwards, right?
So I am not too worried about this because those discussions require initiative and independence of thinking.
I agree with both Wendy and Steve that the learning objectives are flimsy, with no clear way of evaluating if students who have completed this course will have successfully met these goals. They’ve already stated this, but how do you define and educated person and any economist?
I’m of like mind with the previous reviewers on this one and think these need to be rethought/reworked. The content/analysis distinction is helpful, but I think the objectives, as with any others, need to be SMART(er), and think the suggestions others have made here are really useful.
Why would the face-to-face course and online one not have the same assignments? What would be the reason(s) they can’t have everything the face-to-face class will?
One thing I specifically liked about the face-to-face class was Professor Greenlaw were perfectly willing to sit on the desk and stare patiently at the class until someone volunteered an answer. He never gave answers away easily, and that made the classes so much more valuable because it forced students to take the time to figure out problems themselves. I’m not sure the online version of this course, with the discussion board alone, will be able to mimic that atmosphere enough, especially since the timing of people reading others responses or posting their own will be difficult to overcome. I haven’t come across any mention of timing for this, so is there anything in place such as deadlines or certain mandatory online meeting times… to make students get something similar to that experience? (It may be further down the proposal and I haven’t seen it yet.)
This part is excellent, bringing in other colleagues to have more than one person getting the students to interact and think in different ways!
Another site that was particularly good with interactions for people who may never meet each other face to face was https://umw.voicethread.com/.
It is a great way for students to respond to their classmates in a variety of styles (text, video, voice recordings, images…). It would further encourage community within the class, instead of just having X amount of intro videos everyone quickly watches and forgets, if they even bother to watch at all. Maybe requiring people to somehow respond to the videos will make sure they watch and get to know their classmates.
One of the reasons for those students taking this course may be to free up time they would have otherwise spent tied down in a classroom. While I like this idea that encourages a better amount of interactions, what about those who may leave campus or go somewhere with no internet access? (not everyone has a smartphone) Should this class participation be semi-daily instead, since very few regular f2f courses even meet every day?
Really like the idea of sharing good work, either to inspire students or to help those that read it understand how they could have improved their own!
If no one responds to other students’ questions and both the question poser and the classmates get used to the Prof. eventually answering them by the next day, how does that encourage other students to step up? It seems too easy for students to sit back and only check in on conversations without playing an active role themselves.
Very smart to only pick one media outlet, otherwise there would be too much to follow or check, and the class would become harder to keep up with.
I really like that quantitative approach you suggest. It gives students the opportunity to look back and see exactly how this course has shaped their thinking.
Looking at this from the UK, this probably isn’t what we would recognise as a course description, which normally says something about what the course covers (i.e. an extension of the first sentence) rather than how it sits within programmes or fulfils requirements of others. I guess part of this may be the intended audience, but as this may be the first thing a student sees, I’d want it to draw them in more than this does. What’s the course about? Why does it matter? Why should they do it?
One issue I’m having with this proposal as it’s currently written is that I’m not sure who the intended audience is. It reads more like it’s targeted at faculty/reviewers, but that suggests that much of this will need to be redrafted for use with students. The latter won’t need to know that the content is the same as f2f, even if we do so that we can udnerstand how the two are connected and how Steve has thought through and justified his approach (which generally looks excellent BTW).
I’m not sure if it wouldn’t have been more useful for us as reviewers to see the product with commentary rather than the two integrated.
One thought: if the online and f2f are running at the same time, would it be possible to exploit this and to design in connections between the two groups? That speaks to the Community value and would help online students to feel part of the same community as those learning on campus.
Looked through the Course Syllabus site and think this looks great. I’m going to reiterate a couple of comments others have made – the main one being that students new to online learning may find the three spaces a bit confusing, so it’s going to be essential to make it clear what they should get from the different environments. This is especially true for the MOOC and class discussion spaces, since at the moment the MOOC looks like a big open discussion forum to me (but this may reveal my ignorance). For less experienced e-learners, it may be helpful to have one or two 60 second ‘how to’ screencasts so they can see how to do things and what happens when you do (including for example, for Twitter). From a cosmetic perspective, embedding these into the main course site rather than linking out would look cleaner, but may not be possible.
Syllabus looks good, and the opening motivation questions are great, as are the little video clips posted to date – warm, engaging and encouraging. Having one of these to preface each syllabus section is a fine idea, perhaps alongside a news clip of relevance for some of the later topics (I already see a couple of movie clips in places too – fantastic stuff)?
The visual syllabus is great – I did something like this using Prezi for one of my courses last year, but think the way this is presented is even neater and will be shamelessly stealing the idea (what software did you use BTW?).
This also looks great, although quite a lot of work here for you to deal with e-mails. I’m not sure how many students you’ll have for this variant, but it leads me to wonder (a) how scalable this format is (it may be fine for the first time it runs while everyone is finding their way) and accordingly (b) if there’s a way to do this that is. Just thinking out loud, I’m wondering whether some of your seniors might act as moderators? Good for them as well as you and the online students…
It’d be good to see a bit more detail on the last point in the paragraph too – what are those ideas?
I like this.
Agree with other comments here, although note my earlier comment about emphasising to students how this differs form the internal discussion. Will some of the same topics be discussed? Are there different rules? Also, how will students be encouraged top enagge when they know there are external ‘experts’ watching? I think they can and will, but it’ll be important to emphasise (as you do in the intro videos) that this is a shared learning process where (as the evidence of current economic fortunes indicates) none of us has all the answers!
Just wondering how the material will be organised in relation to content and analysis (if I can use that split)?
This might be tougher for a non-US external audience which will be less familiar with the nuances of various presidents’ policies. But a nice idea.
Ditto Steve’s comments. Could just have been posted a s alink, but the syllabus online is great and the learning outcomes etc for each component are really good. This looks well-designed with lots of opportunities for students to engage with the five values.
I agree daily is going to be demanding, and might even put some off. I think ‘regular’ is probably key (and of course there may be occasions when they are daily if news events demand).
But using Twitter a great idea to build community and interactivity.
Great stuff.
It might be an interesting (and helpful) idea to share your feedback on the essays you post, so others can gain insights into what was good and where improvement was needed. Or even encourage the group to provide constructive critique so they understand better what makes for a great essay.
This could be a demanding schedule if the numbers get large. Might you want to allow yourself a ‘one working day’ rule for emails? (We have similar debates in the UK, mindful of work-life balance and the need to set appopriate expectations)
Yes, I think Becky’s right here – your f2f approach of waiting for a response isn’t going to work in this environment… The key will have to be to guide rather han answer.
Again, great stuff and absolutely best practice. My only reservation is whether this is going to be scalable if numbers of students grow.
Yes, agree.
Perfect!
All good stuff, and you ask students to do an essay of their own, but then retreat to more orthodox essays. I’m wondering if you could get students to do something a bit more imaginative for another assignment as an alternative to an essay – a video, poster or photo collage for example?
I’m wondering whether there is scope for students to reflect on their own learning in a more metacognitive sense, i.e. not simply in terms of the meaning, but reflecting on their own learning?
My comment above about an alternative format to essays, perhaps of the student’s choice, would also seem to speak to this value.
Overall I think this course looks great. The five values are well-evidenced and the course has clearly been well thought through, with plenty of thought about how it will migarte and need to differ between online and f2f variants. It’ll be really interesting to see how it turns out…
Picky as well, but it’s not required to teach all secondary school, right?
Agree with Steve that more detail about the course is in order here.
I’ll just echo the concerns of the other reviewers.
Useful, but is it something you can replicate in future iterations?
How will this space be set off from the Discussion space? Will it operate differently than the other space? What will motivate students to participate in both spaces?
I had the same question as Bryan.
Love the visual syllabus.
[Annoyed by the link to the word doc with the link to the site....]
Do you think people will actually watch these videos (from you and from their classmates)? Does it matter if they don’t?
Agreed with all these concerns about the daily aspect.
Also, will these tweets be integrated into the class? How?
I’m also a bit confused by the syllabus. It’s not clear to me what each of the class contribution elements are worth; it’s not clear why there is and Essay 0, 1, 2, 3, then Essay 6.
Envisioning myself as a student and looking at the course site, I think I would be concerned that I didn’t have a handle on what I was supposed to be doing at any given point.
Weekends too?
I like the skype meeting idea.
Agreed. Multiplatform too hard to manage.
Also, what will the format of the exams be? How does that assessment fit with the other aspects of active learning, interactivity, etc.?
How would you identify such students? Would this be ad-hoc? Poor performance on an exam or essay?